GEMs’ Enhanced Recovery Statistics Are Yet To Provide Sufficient Transparency And Quality For Detailed Analysis

GEMs’ Enhanced Recovery Statistics Are Yet To Provide Sufficient Transparency And Quality For Detailed Analysis

PARIS (S&P Global Ratings) June 4, 2024–For the first time, the Global Emerging Markets Risk Database (GEMs) Consortium has released its default and recovery figures publicly. S&P Global Ratings’ cross-practice working group on blended finance and the climate finance gap has analyzed the report, which was published March 25 and compiled using data and disclosures from multinational lending institutions (MLIs) that are members of GEMs Consortium. We find the recently enhanced disclosure of recovery data, which complements previously released default statistics, to be a welcome step. However, in our view, the data in the report is insufficient to allow for the type of in-depth analysis that forms part our credit rating process.

We see, among other things, a lack of disclosure about the impact of guarantees and other forms of credit support on the probability of defaults and recoveries, which still limits our ability to interpret the data. Moreover, the data breakdown lacks sufficient granularity, in our view. It uses asset class definitions and geographic breakdowns that we believe are too broad to be informative for the specific types of entities and issues we rate.

We met with GEMs Consortium’s management team to clarify aspects of the historical dataset and explore possibilities to receive additional disclosures. We understand the Consortium’s teams are actively working on the database to allow enhanced disclosures that better address market participants’ needs. A future edition of the report may provide meaningful additional disclosure by the type of infrastructure, country, and financing (for example, whether secured or unsecured).

At the same time, we acknowledge the challenges of collecting data from 25 institutions operating in different countries and, in some cases, using different accounting standards. Thus, we will continue to assess any new information that is made available by the GEM Consortium to assess whether it can inform our rating calibrations, especially in low- and middle-income countries where data availability is scarcer than in developed nations.

Despite the uniqueness of MLIs’ risk profiles, which benefit from preferred creditor status for loans to sovereigns and have lower risk exposure to the private sector than average financial institutions, future data releases could be useful in assessing the probability of default, recovery expectations, and overall creditworthiness across asset classes and geographies. This would be the case for both individual projects and entity types that we rate, as well as for pooled exposures in entities and structures such as funds and collateralized loan obligations.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

S&P Global Ratings, part of S&P Global Inc. (NYSE: SPGI), is the world’s leading provider of independent credit risk research. We publish more than a million credit ratings on debt issued by sovereign, municipal, corporate and financial sector entities. With over 1,600 credit analysts in 27 countries, and more than 150 years’ experience of assessing credit risk, we offer a unique combination of global coverage and local insight. Our research and opinions about relative credit risk provide market participants with information that helps to support the growth of transparent, liquid debt markets worldwide.

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P’s public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

Share this post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *